Sohyun Park vs Manca Pislak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Park exhibits stronger second serve performance, winning 40.11% of points compared to Pislak's 32.83% in recent months. Does this give Park an edge? Likely, as second serve performance is crucial for predicting match outcomes.
• When it comes to return games, Pislak shines by winning 55.98% of points on the opponent's second serve, whereas Park has managed 48.27%. This indicates Pislak’s skill in challenging the opponent's serve.
• Both players show similar capabilities in first serve returns, with Park at 35.27% and Pislak at 34.52%, making this aspect not a decisive factor for either.
• Park has a better breakpoint-saving percentage of 46.93% compared to Pislak's 37.08%, which could suggest Park handles pressure better on service games.
• Over the past year, Park has a superior match win rate of 59.72%, whereas Pislak stands at 41.67%, suggesting better overall form and consistency by Park.
• On their favorite surface, clay, Park boasts a win rate of 64% compared to Pislak’s 61%, highlighting both players’ strong clay-court abilities but with a slight edge to Park.
• In competition levels, Park has a better record in tournaments >$10K with a win rate of 60.32%, contrasting with Pislak’s 42.86%, pointing to Park's effectiveness at this level.
• Pislak has faced slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank of 375.33 compared to Park's 414.63, which might reflect Pislak’s ability to challenge higher-ranked players.
• Both players display similar deciding set performances, with Park winning 43% and Pislak 40% of such sets, suggesting closely matched resilience.
• Recent events should be considered for current form, but no specific current event data was analyzed for this situation.
• Pislak's conversion rate on breakpoints stands at 49.09%, significantly higher than Park’s 34.77%, which might influence match dynamics if opportunities arise.

Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming tennis match between Park and Pislak presents some intriguing contrasts. Park has showcased stronger second serve performances and a higher breakpoint-saving ability, making them resilient under pressure.

However, Pislak impresses with their superior return game and breakpoint conversion rate, suggesting they could capitalize on Park’s serve more effectively. Both players exhibit comparable prowess on clay and display similarly strong abilities in deciding sets.

Despite Pislak’s tougher opposition faced, Park’s overall higher win rate and consistency suggest a slight edge. Given these factors, Park appears to be the more likely victor in this matchup, although Pislak's return skills cannot be underestimated.